Proportion of total assets financed through liabilities.
Formula:
Definitional Range
Theoretically bounded [0, 1] when net assets are positive: zero means no debt; one means liabilities equal total assets (zero net assets). Values above 1.0 occur when total liabilities exceed total assets, i.e., the organization has negative net assets (accumulated deficits exceed equity). This is a distress indicator but not uncommon in capital-intensive nonprofits (hospitals, housing) carrying large long-term debt.
Benchmarks and rules of thumb
Below 0.50: Generally considered financially stable.
0.50-0.70: Moderate leverage; manageable but warrants monitoring.
Above 0.70: High leverage; common vulnerability threshold (Tuckman & Chang 1991).
Above 1.0: Negative net assets; acute financial risk.
Calculated For: 990 + 990EZ filers.
Arguments
- df
A
data.framecontaining the fields required for computing the metric.- debt
Total liabilities, EOY. Accepts one or two column names; if two are provided they are coalesced with the 990 value taking priority over 990EZ.
- assets
Total assets, EOY. Accepts one or two column names.
- winsorize
The winsorization value (between 0 and 1), defaults to 0.98, which winsorizes at the 1st and 99th percentiles.
- range
Character string specifying the theoretical range of the ratio, used to set winsorization bounds. Default
"zo". Options:"np"(negative to positive),"zp"(zero to positive),"zo"(zero to one),"nz"(negative to zero), or a custom"lo;hi"pair (e.g."0;10").- sanitize
Logical (default
TRUE). IfTRUE, NA values in the financial input columns are imputed to zero before the ratio is computed, respecting form scope: Part X and VIII/IX fields (990 only) are imputed only for 990 filers; Part I summary fields (990 + 990EZ) are imputed for all filers. The returned dataframe always contains the original unmodified input columns.- summarize
Logical. If
TRUE, prints asummary()of the results and plots density curves for all four output columns (raw, winsorized, z-score, percentile). Defaults toFALSE.
Details
Primary uses and key insights
The debt to asset ratio (also called the leverage ratio or debt ratio) measures what fraction of total assets is financed by liabilities rather than equity (net assets). It is the most fundamental solvency indicator in both commercial and nonprofit finance: a ratio approaching 1.0 means the organization is almost entirely debt-financed and has minimal equity cushion; a ratio near 0 means assets are almost entirely owned free of debt.
For nonprofits this ratio is particularly important because: (1) they cannot raise equity capital by issuing stock, so debt is the primary external financing mechanism; and (2) funders, lenders, and rating agencies commonly use this ratio to assess creditworthiness and organizational stability.
Formula variations and their sources
The commercial formula is identical: total liabilities / total assets. Nonprofit applications use the same ratio but may define "total liabilities" differently. This implementation uses total liabilities from the 990 Part X (line 26B; 990EZ Part II line 26), falling back to the 990 Part I summary field (line 21), which includes all short- and long-term obligations reported on the balance sheet.
Some studies use only long-term debt in the numerator to focus on structural leverage rather than near-term obligations. The full liabilities version is used here as the most comprehensive and commonly cited measure.
Why this formula was chosen
Total liabilities / total assets is the most universally understood and reported leverage measure. Using total liabilities rather than a subset avoids definitional ambiguity about which obligations to include. The PZ scope (both 990 and 990EZ) maximizes coverage across all filing types.
Canonical citations
Tuckman, H.P. & Chang, C.F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(4), 445-460.
Greenlee, J.S. & Trussel, J.M. (2000). Predicting the financial vulnerability of charitable organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(2), 199-210.
Keating, E.K., Fischer, M., Gordon, T.P. & Greenlee, J. (2005). Assessing financial vulnerability in the nonprofit sector. Harvard Business School Working Paper 04-016.
Variables used:
F9_10_LIAB_TOT_EOY: Total liabilities, EOY (debt; 990 Part X line 26, 990EZ Part II line 26)F9_01_NAFB_LIAB_TOT_EOY: Total liabilities from Part I line 21 (debt, fallback)F9_10_ASSET_TOT_EOY: Total assets, EOY (assets; 990 Part X line 16, 990EZ Part II line 25)F9_01_NAFB_ASSET_TOT_EOY: Total assets from Part I line 20 (assets, fallback)
Examples
library( fiscal )
data( dat10k )
d <- get_debt_assets_ratio( df = dat10k )
#> :: Assets equal to zero :: 346 case(s) replaced with NaN
head( d[ , c( "debt_assets", "debt_assets_w", "debt_assets_z", "debt_assets_p" ) ] )
#> debt_assets debt_assets_w debt_assets_z debt_assets_p
#> 1 0.1016725 0.1016725 -0.074172138 72
#> 2 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.758550952 1
#> 3 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.758550952 1
#> 4 0.1146878 0.1146878 -0.003320409 73
#> 5 NaN NaN NaN NA
#> 6 0.1912568 0.1912568 0.342739771 78