This script will present several new components of the Nonprofit Open Data Collective data environment using an example motivated by the “Glass Cliff”, or the idea the women are more likely to be appointed to precarious positions of power relative to their male counterparts.
We specifically want to highlight the value of an integrated data environment developed around the EFILE Database, one of the emerging research centerpieces in nonprofit scholarship. This tutorial demonstrates a reproducible data engineering workflow that follows FAIR Data Guidelines. We will answer the research question using a dataset created through the following 8 Steps:
We are using the term “integrated data environment” here to mean:
These things allow us to create more expressive and intuitive data steps that anyone can replicate. It also allows researchers to create custom tools for refining or analyzing data, as demonstrated by the packages used in this workflow.
The glass cliff is a hypothesized phenomenon in which women are more likely to break the “glass ceiling” (i.e. achieve leadership roles in business and government) during periods of crisis or downturn when the risk of failure is highest.
We know from previous studies that male CEOs are put in charge of large, thriving nonprofits while women are more likely to be hired to lead smaller social services organizations.
Here we explore the question of whether female CEOs are more likely to be hired when the current leader is struggling.
Grasse, N. J., Heidbreder, B., Kukla-Acevedo, S. A., & Lecy, J. D. (2024). Some Good News, More Bad News: Two Decades of the Gender Pay Gap for Nonprofit Directors and Chief Financial Officers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X241248854.
Processed IRS 990 Efile data are housed in the NCCS Data Catalog. You can find further information about sources, processing, and variable descriptions here:
There is a growing library of nonprofit tools:
We will be using the following packages for the demo:
# install.packages( "devtools" )
devtools::install_github( 'Nonprofit-Open-Data-Collective/peopleparser' )
devtools::install_github( 'nonprofit-open-data-collective/titleclassifier' )
devtools::install_github( 'nonprofit-open-data-collective/fiscal')
devtools::install_github( 'nonprofit-open-data-collective/irs990efile')
package.list <-
c( "tidyverse",
"knitr", "pander",
"ggrepel", "RecordLinkage",
"data.table", "reshape2",
"utils")
install.packages( package.list )
library( tidyverse )
library( pander )
library( data.table )
library( RecordLinkage )
library( reshape2 )
library( ggrepel )
library( utils )
# nonprofit data packages
library( peopleparser )
library( titleclassifier )
library( fiscal )
# helper functions for the demo:
nodc <- "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nonprofit-Open-Data-Collective/"
repo <- "arnova-2024/refs/heads/main/"
file <- "functions.R"
source( paste0( nodc, repo, file ) )
This step builds Efile tables by loading raw XML efile returns from the Data Commons and using the irs990efile package to parse XML files into rectangular CSV tables.
This code creates data for a sample of 100 nonprofits from 2018:
library( irs990efile )
index <- build_index( tax.years=2018 )
index100 <-
index %>%
filter( FormType %in% c("990","990EZ") ) %>%
sample_n( 100 )
TABLES <- c( "F9-P00-T00-HEADER",
"F9-P01-T00-SUMMARY",
"F9-P08-T00-REVENUE",
"F9-P09-T00-EXPENSES",
"F9-P11-T00-ASSETS" )
URLS <- index100$URL
build_tables( urls=URLS, year=2018, table.names=TABLES )
Typically you would not need to replicate this step since it is a computationally-intensive process. It can take a couple of days to build the full efile database. It is much easier to pull existing CSV files from NCCS:
There are two main ways to access the pre-built tables of the data.
You can download the data locally to your computer from the data catalog
and read it into your R environment or you can use some helper functions
to read it directly in R. We present examples of both below.
# LOCAL DATA
df2010 <- read.csv( "Coding/Data/PartVII/PartVII-2010.csv" )
df2011 <- read.csv( "Coding/Data/PartVII/PartVII-2011.csv" )
The main variables of interest in these data are the board member
names and their titles. We will utilize pre-built packages from the Nonprofit
Open Data Repositories to clean these variables further (the
packages are peopleparser
and
titleclassifier
).
root <- paste0( nodc, repo )
fn <- "data/PART-VII-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
url <- paste0( root, fn )
partvii <- read.csv( url )
NAME | TAXYR | FORMTYPE | F9_07_COMP_DTK_NAME_PERS |
---|---|---|---|
President and Fellows of Middlebury College | 2009 | 990 | Ronald Liebowitz |
President and Fellows of Middlebury College | 2009 | 990 | Frederick M Fritz |
President and Fellows of Middlebury College | 2009 | 990 | Marna C Whittington |
President and Fellows of Middlebury College | 2009 | 990 | Kendrick R Wilson III |
President and Fellows of Middlebury College | 2009 | 990 | S Carolyn Ramos |
President and Fellows of Middlebury College | 2009 | 990 | Roxanne M Leighton |
F9_07_COMP_DTK_TITLE | F9_07_COMP_DTK_AVE_HOUR_WEEK | F9_07_COMP_DTK_COMP_ORG |
---|---|---|
President | 40 | 409609 |
Chair | 5 | 0 |
Vice Chair | 5 | 0 |
Vice Chair | 5 | 0 |
Alumni Trustee | 1 | 0 |
Charter Trustee | 1 | 0 |
Now let’s use peopleparser to clean the names. Names do not arrive standardized in any specific format:
## Louis Bacon ;; KAREN HELENE ;; KEVIN LENIHAN
## MICHAEL K LAUF ;; DELAINNA BURTON ;; Patrick J Norton
## Deborah Buckley ;; Elisabeth B Robert ;; Ann D Peterson
## ALEXANDER WESTPHAL MD ;; VIRGINIA HOWARD ;; Ann Williams Jackson
## ELIZABETH OLIVEIRA ;; Katie Smith Abbott ;; Frank W Sesno
The peopleparser package will remove nuisance text and split the name string into 5 parts:
And add a predicted gender label (M/F/U) plus confidence level once it is able to identify the individual’s first name:
## [1] "REV|KENDRICK|R|WILSON|III||M|100"
## [1] "DOCTOR|KENDRICK|R|WILSON|III||M|100"
# gender prediction is based on first names
peopleparser::parse.name( "Wilson, K R Until June 2008" )
## [1] "|K|R|WILSON|||U|0.0"
nm <- partvii[[ "F9_07_COMP_DTK_NAME_PERS" ]] %>% unique()
nm.parsed <- peopleparser::parse.names( nm )
name | salutation | first_name | middle_name | last_name |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ronald Liebowitz | RONALD | LIEBOWITZ | ||
Frederick M Fritz | FREDERICK | M | FRITZ | |
Marna C Whittington | MARNA | C | WHITTINGTON | |
Kendrick R Wilson III | KENDRICK | R | WILSON | |
S Carolyn Ramos | S | CAROLYN | RAMOS | |
Roxanne M Leighton | ROXANNE | M | LEIGHTON |
suffix | status | gender | gender_confidence |
---|---|---|---|
M | 99.7 | ||
M | 100 | ||
F | 100 | ||
III | M | 100 | |
F | 100 | ||
F | 100 |
Join parsed names back to the original data frame.
# CORE R VERSION OF A TABLE JOIN
partvii <-
partvii %>%
merge( nm.parsed,
by.x="F9_07_COMP_DTK_NAME_PERS", by.y="name",
all.x=T )
root <- paste0( nodc, repo )
fn <- "data/PART-VII-SAMPLE-10-PARSED-NAMES.CSV"
url <- paste0( root, fn )
partvii <- read.csv( url )
# steps from titleclassifier package
titles <-
partvii %>%
standardize_df() %>%
remove_dates() %>%
standardize_conj() %>%
split_titles() %>%
standardize_spelling() %>%
gen_status_codes() %>%
standardize_titles() %>%
categorize_titles()
## ✔ standardize df step complete
## ✔ remove dates step complete
## ✔ standardize conjunctions step complete
## ✔ split titles step complete
## ✔ standardize spelling step complete
## ✔ generate status codes step complete
## ✔ standardize titles step complete
## ✔ categorize titles step complete
dtk.name | title.raw | title.mult.x | title.order |
---|---|---|---|
KATHRYN DUPREE | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR | 0 | 1 |
LINDA GRIMM | ACADEMY DIRECTOR | 0 | 1 |
ARLENE KAYE | DIRECTOR OF CHILDREN’S BEHAVIORAL SERVICES | 0 | 1 |
TACIE LOWE | DIRECTOR OF INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT | 0 | 1 |
CARL J CASPER | CHAIR | 0 | 1 |
THOMAS IGOE | TREASURER/SECRETARY | 1 | 2 |
THOMAS IGOE | TREASURER/SECRETARY | 1 | 1 |
LARRY WOOD | DIRECTOR | 0 | 1 |
STEPHEN SIMONSON | RESIDENTIAL DIRECTOR | 0 | 1 |
ARLENE KAYE | CBD DIRECTOR | 0 | 1 |
Title processing steps from the package:
title.raw | title.v4 | |
---|---|---|
150 | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/FSE DIRECTOR | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR |
151 | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/FSE DIRECTOR | FSE DIRECTOR |
152 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
153 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
154 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
155 | DIRECTOR, FLUTIE FDN. AND FSE | DIRECTOR AND FLUTIE FDN AND FSE |
156 | CO-CHAIR/DIRECTOR | CO-CHAIR |
157 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
158 | CO-CHAIR/DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
159 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
160 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
161 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
162 | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR |
163 | CLERK/DIRECTOR | CLERK |
164 | CLERK/DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
165 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
title.v7 | title.standard | |
---|---|---|
150 | CEO | CEO |
151 | FSE DIRECTOR | NA |
152 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
153 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
154 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
155 | DIRECTOR AND FLUTIE FDN AND FSE | NA |
156 | CO-CHAIR | BOARD PRESIDENT |
157 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
158 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
159 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
160 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
161 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
162 | CEO | CEO |
163 | CLERK | CLERK |
164 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
165 | DIRECTOR | DIRECTOR |
Pay and hours tabulated relative to other employees in the same org:
dtk.name | title.standard | tot.hours | |
---|---|---|---|
15 | KATHRYN DUPEE | CEO | 37.5 |
16 | JOHN BALDINO | DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES | 37.5 |
17 | JOSEPH SPITERI | GENERAL MANAGER | 37.5 |
18 | TACIE LOWE | NA | 37.5 |
19 | THOMAS IGOE | BOARD TREASURER | 0.5 |
20 | KARA FARACLAS | BOARD VICE PRESIDENT | 0.5 |
21 | JAMES MCPARTLAND PHD | DIRECTOR | 0.5 |
22 | JANETTE JOHNSON | DIRECTOR | 0.5 |
23 | STEPHEN WIZNER | DIRECTOR | 0.5 |
hours.rank | tot.comp | pay.max | pay.rank | |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 1 | 176077 | 188130 | 3 |
16 | 1 | 141983 | 188130 | 7 |
17 | 1 | 141538 | 188130 | 8 |
18 | 1 | 120327 | 188130 | 18 |
19 | 2 | 0 | 188130 | 25 |
20 | 2 | 0 | 188130 | 25 |
21 | 2 | 0 | 188130 | 25 |
22 | 2 | 0 | 188130 | 25 |
23 | 2 | 0 | 188130 | 25 |
There are several data cleaning and preparation steps that need to be performed on the base data before our analysis. We are omitting this step because it is outside the scope of the workflow. All that you need to know is leadership transitions are identified by isolating CEOs and finding periods where the individuals change. Transitions are labeled as:
We provide a cleaned subset of the data. We provide two dataframes of
1000 and 10 unique nonprofits that experienced at least one CEO
transition between 2009 and 2019. It should be noted that it is possible
for these organizations to experience more than one transition during
this time frame. As such, we have a total of 1067 transitions. We can
analyze various facets of these transitions.
We will first build a financials table by selecting the relevant 990 parts, then combining them:
## JOINING ONE TO ONE TABLES
root <- paste0( nodc, repo )
fn1 <- "data/F9-P00-T00-HEADER-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
fn2 <- "data/F9-P01-T00-SUMMARY-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
fn3 <- "data/F9-P08-T00-REVENUE-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
fn4 <- "data/F9-P09-T00-EXPENSES-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
fn5 <- "data/F9-P10-T00-BALANCE-SHEET-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
d1 <- read.csv( paste0( root, fn1 ) )
d2 <- read.csv( paste0( root, fn2 ) )
d3 <- read.csv( paste0( root, fn3 ) )
d4 <- read.csv( paste0( root, fn4 ) )
d5 <- read.csv( paste0( root, fn5 ) )
The efile one-to-one tables all share the same IDs:
## [1] "OBJECTID" "URL" "RETURN_VERSION" "ORG_EIN"
## [5] "ORG_NAME_L1" "ORG_NAME_L2" "RETURN_TYPE" "TAX_YEAR"
## [9] "EIN2"
Which makes merging files easy:
Note that dataset dimensions should not change for one-to-one merges:
## [1] 107 55
## [1] 107 50
## [1] 107 376
See the appendix for the code used to compile the five tables above
for the sample.
We can also follow similar steps for the 1000 EIN observations. We don’t
show the steps here due to their run time but instead provide the
compiled df and some further steps to prepare it for analysis and
understand the data.
peek <-
c( "EIN","TAXYR",
"period", "CEO1",
"CEO2", "trans_type" )
ceo_trans_1000_fncl_wT[ 1:40, peek ] %>% pander::pander()
EIN | TAXYR | period | CEO1 | CEO2 | trans_type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10024245 | 2013 | T-2 | JOHN PORTER | NA | MF |
10024245 | 2014 | T-1 | JOHN PORTER | NA | MF |
10024245 | 2015 | T0 | JOHN PORTER | NA | MF |
10024245 | 2016 | T1 | DEB NEUMAN | NA | MF |
10024245 | 2017 | T2 | DEB NEUMAN | NA | MF |
10196194 | 2014 | T-2 | NORMAND DUBREUIL | NA | MM |
10196194 | 2015 | T-1 | NORMAND DUBREUIL | NA | MM |
10196194 | 2016 | T0 | NORMAND DUBREUIL | COLE TUCKER | MM |
10196194 | 2017 | T1 | COLE TUCKER | NA | MM |
10196194 | 2018 | T2 | COLE TUCKER | NA | MM |
10206603 | 2010 | T-2 | DONNA STECKINO | NA | FM |
10206603 | 2011 | T-1 | DONNA STECKINO | NA | FM |
10206603 | 2012 | T0 | KERRY WOOD | NA | FM |
10206603 | 2013 | T1 | KERRY WOOD | NA | FM |
10206603 | 2014 | T2 | KERRY WOOD | NA | FM |
10206603 | 2012 | T-2 | KERRY WOOD | NA | MF |
10206603 | 2013 | T-1 | KERRY WOOD | NA | MF |
10206603 | 2014 | T0 | KERRY WOOD | NA | MF |
10206603 | 2015 | T1 | JENNIFER HOGAN | NA | MF |
10206603 | 2016 | T2 | JENNIFER HOGAN | NA | MF |
10211481 | 2014 | T-2 | STACY SCHAFFER | NA | FF |
10211481 | 2015 | T-1 | STACY SCHAFFER | NA | FF |
10211481 | 2016 | T0 | STACY SCHAFFER | BETHANY BILODEAU | FF |
10211481 | 2017 | T1 | BETHANY BILODEAU | NA | FF |
10211481 | 2018 | T2 | BETHANY BILODEAU | NA | FF |
10211484 | 2009 | T-2 | KENT ULERY | NA | MM |
10211484 | 2010 | T-1 | KENT ULERY | NA | MM |
10211484 | 2011 | T0 | ROBERT GROVE-MARKWOOD | NA | MM |
10211484 | 2012 | T1 | ROBERT GROVE-MARKWOOD | NA | MM |
10211484 | 2013 | T2 | ROBERT GROVE-MARKWOOD | NA | MM |
10211497 | 2012 | T-2 | WILLIAM ADAMS | NA | MM |
10211497 | 2013 | T-1 | WILLIAM ADAMS | NA | MM |
10211497 | 2014 | T0 | DAVID GREENE | WILLIAM ADAMS | MM |
10211497 | 2015 | T1 | DAVID GREENE | NA | MM |
10211497 | 2016 | T2 | DAVID GREENE | NA | MM |
10211509 | 2009 | T-2 | DANIEL KUNKLE | NA | MM |
10211509 | 2010 | T-1 | DANIEL KUNKLE | NA | MM |
10211509 | 2011 | T0 | DANIEL KUNKLE | NA | MM |
10211509 | 2012 | T1 | MATTHEW RUBY | NA | MM |
10211509 | 2013 | T2 | MATTHEW RUBY | NA | MM |
There are 349 transitions from male to male (MM) transitions, 253 male to female transitions (MF), 160 female to male transitions (FM), and 305 female to female transitions (FF) in our dataset. FF orgs have the smallest number of employees, on average while MF have the highest. It should be noted that the standard deviation for number of employees is pretty high, suggesting a wide range of nonprofits. MM nonprofits have the highest total expeness on average and the highest total assets. Again, the SDs are wide, suggesting large variation across observations.
F9_01_EXP_TOT_PY | F9_01_EXP_REV_LESS_EXP_CY | F9_01_EXP_REV_LESS_EXP_PY |
---|---|---|
3217608 | 56922 | 31606 |
870793 | -194147 | -257955 |
692598 | 42635 | 31852 |
11765651 | 519017 | 403144 |
8708339 | -558773 | -308774 |
The fiscal package contains the following financial ratios:
df <- get_aer( df ) # Assets to Revenues Ratio
df <- get_arr( df ) # Assets to Revenues Ratio
df <- get_cr( df ) # Current Ratio
df <- get_dar( df ) # Debt to Asset Ratio
df <- get_der( df ) # Debt to Equity Ratio
df <- get_dgdr( df ) # Donation/Grant Dependence Ratio
df <- get_dmr( df ) # Debt Management Ratio
df <- get_doch( df ) # Days of Operating Cash on Hand
df <- get_doci( df ) # Days of Operating Cash and Investments
df <- get_eidr( df ) # Earned Income Dependence Ratio
df <- get_er( df ) # Equity Ratio
df <- get_ggr( df ) # Government Grants Ratio
df <- get_iidr( df ) # Investment Income Dependence Ratio
df <- get_lar( df ) # Lands to Assets Ratio
df <- get_moch( df ) # Months of Operating Cash on Hand
df <- get_or( df ) # Operating Margin
df <- get_per( df ) # Program Efficiency Ratio
df <- get_podpm( df ) # Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin
df <- get_predpm( df ) # Pre-Depreciation Profitability Margin
df <- get_qr( df ) # Quick Ratio
df <- get_ssr( df ) # Self Sufficiency Ratio
df <- get_stdr( df ) # Short Term Debt Ratio
We will add the post-depreciation profitability margin and the quick ratio to the data:
## [1] "Revenues cannot be equal to zero: 0 cases have been replaced with NA."
## podpm podpm.w podpm.n podpm.p
## Min. :-0.50950 Min. :-0.46216 Min. :-3.3121 Min. : 1
## 1st Qu.:-0.07950 1st Qu.:-0.07950 1st Qu.:-0.4535 1st Qu.:25
## Median : 0.01107 Median : 0.01107 Median : 0.2230 Median :49
## Mean :-0.01858 Mean :-0.01879 Mean : 0.0000 Mean :49
## 3rd Qu.: 0.05557 3rd Qu.: 0.05557 3rd Qu.: 0.5555 3rd Qu.:73
## Max. : 0.38204 Max. : 0.31425 Max. : 2.4878 Max. :97
## NA's :10 NA's :10 NA's :10 NA's :10
## [1] "Net assets cannot be zero: 0 cases have been replaced with NA."
## dgdr dgdr.w dgdr.n dgdr.p
## Min. :0.04165 Min. :0.04638 Min. :-1.6821 Min. : 1
## 1st Qu.:0.42370 1st Qu.:0.42370 1st Qu.:-0.4077 1st Qu.:10
## Median :0.61054 Median :0.61054 Median : 0.2233 Median :19
## Mean :0.54480 Mean :0.54442 Mean : 0.0000 Mean :19
## 3rd Qu.:0.80102 3rd Qu.:0.80102 3rd Qu.: 0.8667 3rd Qu.:28
## Max. :0.92779 Max. :0.90902 Max. : 1.2314 Max. :37
## NA's :70 NA's :70 NA's :70 NA's :70
For details on the definitions and calculation of the ratios try:
The Business Master File contains important information not available on 990 forms such as organizational NTEE codes. In addition, the NCCS BMF files contain standardized geographies and other useful information.
The BMF rows for our sample have been precompiled:
Now we’re ready for some analyses! The Glass Cliff Phenomenon
hypothesizes that women are chosen for positions of power when these
positions are more precarious. One way to denote a precarious position
is by the firm’s financial performance; poor financial performance
suggests more precariousness. We acknowledge that financial performance
is comprised of several different dimensions and it is sometimes hard to
arrive at clean conclusions about “poorly performing nonprofits.” For
demonstration purposes we will specifically focus on the financial
performance metric of post-depreciation profitability margin (podpm).
This is defined as an income measure that determines a firm’s
profitability after incorporating non-cash expenses. Higher values of
this metric are generally desirable because the indicate that an org is
not lost its revenue to expenses. We will use the package
fiscal
from the Open Data Collective to calculate our
variable of interest. The default parameters of the respective functions
are already built for the 990 naming conventions so usage is pretty
straight forward!
ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT <- read.csv( "data/toy_ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT.csv" )
ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT <- get_podpm(ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT)
## [1] "Revenues cannot be equal to zero: 0 cases have been replaced with NA."
## podpm podpm.w podpm.n podpm.p
## Min. :-619.4798 Min. :-0.64627 Min. :-4.04004 Min. : 1.00
## 1st Qu.: -0.0327 1st Qu.:-0.03269 1st Qu.:-0.32851 1st Qu.: 25.00
## Median : 0.0194 Median : 0.01937 Median :-0.01358 Median : 50.00
## Mean : -0.0964 Mean : 0.02162 Mean : 0.00000 Mean : 50.29
## 3rd Qu.: 0.0809 3rd Qu.: 0.08092 3rd Qu.: 0.35867 3rd Qu.: 75.00
## Max. : 39.8564 Max. : 0.57166 Max. : 3.32717 Max. :100.00
## NA's :203 NA's :203 NA's :203 NA's :203
#Let's plot these measures
plot_temp <- ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT %>%
group_by(trans_type, period)%>%
summarize(median_podpm =median(podpm, na.rm = T))
txt <-
"Median Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin by Transition Type"
ggplot( data = plot_temp,
aes( x = period, y = median_podpm,
group = trans_type, color = trans_type ) ) +
geom_line(linewidth = 1.5)+
geom_text_repel( aes(label = round(median_podpm,3)), size = 5,
nudge_x = -0.07, nudge_y = 0.001,
segment.size = 0, segment.color = NA ) +
theme_bw( ) +
# theme(text = element_text(size = 24))+
scale_x_discrete(labels = c("T-2", "T-1", "Transition", "T+1", "T+2"))+
labs(color = "Transition" ) +
xlab( "Period" )+
ylab( "Median Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin" ) +
ggtitle( txt ) +
geom_vline( xintercept = 3, linetype = "dashed" )
################################################
#Now doing density plots of these respective vars
################################################
#Let's compare the MM density to MF density in the t-1 period for the vats
ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MM <-
ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT %>%
filter(trans_type == "MM" & period == "T-1")
ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MF <-
ceo_trans_1000EIN_fncl_wT %>%
filter(trans_type == "MF"& period == "T-1")
txt <-
"Density ofPost-Depreciation Profitability Margin by Transition at t-1"
ggplot() +
geom_density( data = ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MM,
aes(x = podpm, fill = "lightblue"), alpha = 0.5) +
geom_density( data = ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MF,
aes(x = podpm, fill = "pink"), alpha = 0.5) +
xlim(-1,1)+
theme_bw()+
scale_fill_manual( name = "Transition",
values = c('lightblue', 'pink'),
labels = c("pink" = "MF" , "lightblue" = "MM") ) +
xlab( "Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin" )+
ylab( "Density" ) +
ggtitle( txt )
The glass cliff phenomenon suggest that financial precarious NPs (seen by a significant drop in their financials between T-2 and T-1) would more likely hire a female to the CEO position. We start by looking at the PODPM variable over the periods. MM organizations start with the highest median profitability margin but also experience the steepest drop between T-2 and T-1. We see a similar slope for FM organizations although the starting point is the lowest in the entire group. MF transitions do not appear to be preceded by steep changes in profitability. If the glass cliff hypothesis were true, we would expect the observed trajectory of FM but would not expect the other firms to have similar metrics around their transitions. This graph calls for further analysis on other financial measures to determine whether FM firms display a transition during significantly more precarious times than their counterparts.
As a final understanding of the data, we look at the distribution of
PODPM at T-1. We consider the two most relevant groups of MM and MF. We
see that the distribution of financial variables tends to be extremely
similar to both types of transitions, again failing to provide strong
motivation for a glass cliff phenomenon.
The Glass Cliff Phenomenon hypothesizes that women are chosen for
positions of power when these positions are more precarious. One way to
denote a precarious position is by the firm’s financial performance;
poor financial performance suggests more precariousness. We acknowledge
that financial performance is comprised of several different dimensions
and it is sometimes hard to arrive at clean conclusions about “poorly
performing nonprofits.” For demonstration purposes we will specifically
focus on the financial performance metric of post-depreciation
profitability margin (podpm). This is defined as an income measure that
determines a firm’s profitability after incorporating non-cash expenses.
Higher values of this metric are generally desirable because the
indicate that an org is not lost its revenue to expenses. We will use
the package fiscal
from the Open Data Collective to
calculate our variable of interest. The default parameters of the
respective functions are already built for the 990 naming conventions so
usage is pretty straight forward!
# Make sure to run the code chunk about
# to ensure your df_long_fncl has all
# the necessary variables
#site: https://github.com/Nonprofit-Open-Data-Collective/fiscal/tree/main/R
ceo_trans_1000_fncl <- get_podpm( ceo_trans_1000_fncl )
#Let's plot these measures
plot_temp <- ceo_trans_1000_fncl %>%
group_by(trans_type, period)%>%
summarize(median_podpm =median(podpm, na.rm = T))
ggplot( data = plot_temp,
aes( x = period,
y = median_podpm,
group = trans_type,
color = trans_type) ) +
geom_line(linewidth = 1.5)+
geom_text_repel( aes(label = round(median_podpm,3) ),
size = 5, nudge_x = -0.07,
nudge_y = 0.001, segment.size = 0,
segment.color = NA) +
theme_bw( ) +
scale_x_discrete(labels = c("T-2", "T-1", "Transition", "T+1", "T+2"))+
labs(color = "Transition") +
xlab( "Period" )+
ylab( "Median Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin" ) +
ggtitle("Median Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin by Transition Type") +
geom_vline(xintercept = 3, linetype = "dashed")
################################################
#Now doing density plots of these respective vars
################################################
#Let's compare the MM density to MF density in the t-1 period for the vats
ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MM <-
ceo_trans_1000_fncl %>%
filter( trans_type == "MM" & period == "T-1" )
ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MF <-
ceo_trans_1000_fncl %>%
filter( trans_type == "MF" & period == "T-1" )
txt <-
"Density ofPost-Depreciation Profitability Margin by Transition at t-1"
ggplot() +
geom_density( data = ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MM,
aes(x = podpm, fill = "lightblue"),
alpha = 0.5 ) +
geom_density( data = ceo_trans_1000_fncl_MF,
aes(x = podpm, fill = "pink"),
alpha = 0.5 ) +
xlim(-1,1)+
theme_bw()+
scale_fill_manual( name = "Transition",
values = c('lightblue', 'pink'),
labels = c("pink" = "MF" , "lightblue" = "MM") ) +
xlab("Post-Depreciation Profitability Margin")+
ylab("Density") +
ggtitle( txt )
The glass cliff phenomenon suggest that financial precarious NPs (seen by a significant drop in their financials between T-2 and T-1) would more likely hire a female to the CEO position. We start by looking at the PODPM variable over the periods. MM organizations start with the highest median profitability margin but also experience the steepest drop between T-2 and T-1. We see a similar slope for FM organizations although the starting point is the lowest in the entire group. MF transitions do not appear to be preceded by steep changes in profitability. If the glass cliff hypothesis were true, we would expect the observed trajectory of FM but would not expect the other firms to have similar metrics around their transitions. This graph calls for further analysis on other financial measures to determine whether FM firms display a transition during significantly more precarious times than their counterparts.
As a final understanding of the data, we look at the distribution of PODPM at T-1. We consider the two most relevant groups of MM and MF. We see that the distribution of financial variables tends to be extremely similar to both types of transitions, again failing to provide strong motivation for a glass cliff phenomenon.
The demo files above (a sample of 10 nonprofits), read directly from the demo repo on GitHub, were compiled using the following code:
EIN2_10 <-
c("EIN-02-0240383", "EIN-03-0179298",
"EIN-04-2104310", "EIN-04-2259692",
"EIN-04-2592472", "EIN-04-2596491",
"EIN-04-3266589", "EIN-04-3543134",
"EIN-05-0258941", "EIN-06-0840436" )
tables <-
c( "F9-P00-T00-HEADER",
"F9-P01-T00-SUMMARY",
"F9-P08-T00-REVENUE",
"F9-P09-T00-EXPENSES",
"F9-P10-T00-BALANCE-SHEET")
for( i in tables )
{
for( j in 2009:2020 )
{
df <- NULL
try( df <- get_table( i, j ) )
if( is.null(df) ){ next }
sub <- dplyr::filter( df$EIN2 %in% EIN2_10 )
fn <- paste0( i, "-", j, "-SAMPLE-10.CSV" )
write.csv( sub, fn, row.names=F, na="" )
}
}
# COMBINE ALL YEARS TO SINGLE FILE
root <- "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nonprofit-Open-Data-Collective/arnova-2024/refs/heads/main/data/"
for( i in tables )
{
d.list <- list()
for( j in 2009:2020 )
{
fn <- paste0( i, "-", j, "-SAMPLE-10.CSV" )
url <- paste0( root, fn )
df <- read.csv( url, colClasses = "character" )
d.list[[ as.character(j) ]] <- df
}
dd <- dplyr::bind_rows( d.list )
filename <- paste0( i, "-SAMPLE-10.CSV" )
write.csv( dd, filename, row.names=F, na="" )
}
# [1] "F9-P00-T00-HEADER-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
# [2] "F9-P01-T00-SUMMARY-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
# [3] "F9-P08-T00-REVENUE-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
# [4] "F9-P09-T00-EXPENSES-SAMPLE-10.CSV"
# [5] "F9-P10-T00-BALANCE-SHEET-SAMPLE-10.CSV"